politics

Shock decision in Europe: Ban on conversion therapies demanded!

Photorealistic featured image for "Shock decision in Europe: Ban on conversion therapies demanded!" with an Austrian reference

A historic resolution by the Council of Europe!

On the evening of January 29, 2026, an event took place in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe that is dominating headlines across Europe: The demand for a ban on all conversion therapies was adopted by an overwhelming majority. This resolution could have far-reaching consequences for the LGBTIQ+ community and legislation in the member states.

What are conversion therapies?

Conversion therapies, also known as 'reparative therapies', are pseudoscientific practices that aim to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity. These methods are based on the false assumption that homosexuality or transgender identity can be 'cured'. These practices are not only ineffective but also extremely harmful. They often lead to psychological distress such as depression, anxiety, and increased suicide rates.

The Council of Europe: A brief overview

The Council of Europe, founded in 1949, is one of Europe's oldest political institutions. It is committed to upholding human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. The Parliamentary Assembly, which is composed of representatives from the member states, plays a central role in formulating recommendations and resolutions. The decision to ban conversion therapies is a significant step towards more comprehensive protection of human rights.

The vote: A look behind the scenes

The resolution was supported not only by progressive forces but also received approval from conservative camps. This shows that recognition of the danger of conversion therapies cuts across party lines. Mario Lindner, SPÖ spokesperson for LGBTIQ+ affairs, stressed that this is not about ideology but about the fundamental right to a self-determined and healthy life.

Austria's role and response

In Austria, the topic of conversion therapy has been under discussion for several years. The SPÖ has long advocated for a ban on these practices. The current governing coalition included this issue in its program, but concrete legislative steps have so far been lacking. The Council of Europe's decision could now act as a catalyst for faster implementation of a ban in Austria.

SPÖ spokesperson Lindner emphasizes: "This decision of the Council of Europe gives us the momentum we need to finally take concrete measures in Austria."

International comparisons: Who has already acted?

Various countries around the world have already taken steps to ban conversion therapies. In Germany, such a ban was passed in 2020, but it applies only to minors. In the United States, 20 states have already enacted laws that restrict or ban such practices. These international examples show that a comprehensive ban is feasible and necessary.

The impact on society

A ban on conversion therapies could have far-reaching positive effects on the communities involved. It would not only protect the mental health of LGBTIQ+ people, but also send a strong signal against discrimination and in favor of accepting diversity. Experts agree that the recognition and support of the identity of LGBTIQ+ people is crucial for their well-being.

A glimpse into the future

The adoption of this resolution is an important step, but there is still much to do. The member states of the Council of Europe must implement the recommendations and enact concrete laws. In Austria, this could mean that the issue will be placed more prominently on the political agenda in the coming months.

The societal discourse on LGBTIQ+ rights and the acceptance of diversity will continue. The Council of Europe's decision could be seen as a milestone in the European history of human rights.

Conclusion: A victory for human rights

The Council of Europe's decision to call for a ban on conversion therapies is a significant success for the LGBTIQ+ community and an important step toward a more humane Europe. It is now up to the individual states to put this demand into practice and to send a strong signal for human rights.